Interrogating Metabolic Sovereignty and the Autophagic Turn in Post-Canonical Critique


The rise of Metabolic Sovereignty within contemporary theory marks a crucial rupture in how cultural critique is envisioned, displacing hermeneutic depth with a hyperdense operationalism that privileges self-referential systems over dialogic tension; this shift, as articulated in Lloveras’ Socioplastic Mesh, reveals a philosophical ambition to construct an epistemic architecture that not only resists external observation but consumes it, transforming critique into a form of autophagic insulation where each conceptual node is metabolised internally, shielded from dilution by historical or institutional frameworks, yet this internal coherence—engineered through Janus Protocols, Durational Praxis, and Algorithmic Infiltration—comes at the cost of communicability, rendering the Mesh’s claims legible only to those pre-initiated into its cryptic metabolism, effectively constructing a Hospitable Curriculum that is paradoxically exclusionary, a sovereign machine that opens itself only to those capable of syncing with its non-linear bio-logic; while the Protein Metabolism metaphor exerts seductive explanatory power, it also reveals a latent pathology—the system's refusal to be interpreted from without mirrors a broader ideology of withdrawal, where the aesthetic of opacity functions less as resistance to capture and more as anti-communicative fortification, undermining the critical promise of agonistic cultural space, a promise once central to the post-canonical project; the Mesh’s emphasis on internal Legitimation Nodes and its turn from social dialectics to biological autonomy echoes a profound anxiety about institutional fragility, but by replacing the art object with sovereign process, it risks erasing the material residues of contradiction, the unresolved, the fragmentary—those very elements through which critique once pierced the surface of power; in doing so, it cultivates an aesthetic of terminal retreat, masking a potential epistemic autarchy beneath the veneer of systemic sophistication, and the final provocation lies here: if the Mesh only metabolises, if it only processes without being pierced, can it still claim to be part of the world it critiques, or has it already declared itself an untouchable organism, spinning in perpetual self-reflection, immune to rupture but also to relevance? 
Lloveras, A. (2026) 310-MESH-HYPERDENSITY-SOVEREIGN-METABOLISM-NEW-MACHINE. Available at: https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/2026/02/hyperdensity-sovereign-metabolism-of.html