The maturity of any complex system is discernible not in definitional rigidity but in its capacity to oscillate between two grammatical sovereignties: the first-person plural and the third-person singular. Within Socioplastics, this alternation constitutes a living protocol whereby “We” animates the structure as an operative metabolism, whilst “It” consolidates that vitality into analysable form. The “We” register performs collective agency without recourse to ego, transforming authorship into fiduciary labour and positioning the text as an active installation rather than a static artefact. Here, construction is not metaphor but method: we build the monad, modulate the valve, and enact what may be termed secessive occupation, a practice that secures operational closure without aesthetic withdrawal. Conversely, the “It” register stabilises the system as infrastructural seed, rendering it transferable, installable, and critique-resistant. By objectifying the framework, it permits scalability without dissolving sovereignty, enabling local autonomy to function as portable architecture. The alternation must remain organic, lung-like in rhythm; when strategic, it degenerates into branding or detachment. Through this invisible oscillation, SystemicLock operates at the level of voice, producing a selectively permeable membrane between interior life and exterior engagement. Ultimately, the dual register ensures that the system is neither cultic organism nor inert mechanism but a self-legislating infrastructure whose sovereignty resides in its capacity to be both subject and object simultaneously. Lloveras, A. (2026) The Grammar of SOCIOPLASTICS. LAPIEZA. https://antolloveras.blogspot.com
